Here is something so startling one cannot believe it at first. But then you have the case of Anita Moorjani to reckon with too (see my post)…
When following conventional methods, you must expect to get conventional results.
-Grigori Grabovoi
This Cellular and Organ Regeneration (CORe) work, founded by Grabavoi, resetting cells and reprogramming DNA continues to impress me. I’ve had the opportunity to assist perhaps a dozen people so far with their “self-healing”. One woman is actually attempting to re-grow her uterus. Yes, this is in fact possible and has been documented in Russia. Why haven’t you heard about this? Why would you? It won’t further mainstream media’s nor its advertisers’ goals of perpetuating the “sick care” industry, nor will it make anyone any “real” money.
This regrowth is possible for my client because she believes that it is possible, and is focusing on manifesting this as her reality. Currently, this lovely woman is experiencing new sensations in her head (neural pathways being created perhaps) and also new twinges in her abdomen.
No one wants to…
View original post 235 more words
Bhaga
This is a picture of our body-cells DNA. It is a way to associate visibly my evolving cells to this blog, just as they are part of my overall evolutive conscious process.
Lab of Evolution 
Mar 21, 2013 @ 17:50:57
poorly documented cases of spontaneous remission are rife on the internet
my neighbour across the street made it into the 6% of women who survive her cancer type
I find it disturbing when people assert these stories as proof of what they already believed
how come no one has one of these and it’s different than they expect?
LikeLike
Mar 22, 2013 @ 14:56:59
Perhaps in these specific cases you are overreacting?
Anita Moorjani’s case is rather well documented. And she was not expcting anything.
Automatically refusing to believe anything that could bring evidence of something one has already decided doesn’t exist, is just the opposite extreme attitude, not a better one than the one you condemn.
LikeLike
Mar 22, 2013 @ 17:26:40
I am sorry that that is how you interpreted beyond my words.
LikeLike
Mar 22, 2013 @ 21:45:46
this is a case of a person overcoming an illness that I followed and helped me in my recovery process
I followed his blog about his recovery efforts as he posted them
so it’s repeatable by others
because his diagnosis through recovery is actually fully documented and explained
but more than that, it’s replicable by others with the same condition
http://tech.gaeatimes.com/index.php/archive/scott-adams-conquers-incurable-spasmodic-dysphonia-voice-loss/
stories of surviving surgery and going into remission, as explained by supernatural intervention
does not help anyone because you cannot rely on miracles
they are not reproducible
nor are the subject experiences that a person has
so whatever happened to her
what she experienced is what her brain allowed her to interpret from her beliefs, life experience and expectations and her capacity to understand
while her brain was basically shutting down
the will to survive and our connections to the world
certainly play a part in recovery and the effort to survive
LikeLike
Mar 23, 2013 @ 06:58:09
I am very sorry myself that I misunderstood your first answer. Thank you for providing me with this explanatory second answer through an example. I think I am getting your point better now.
LikeLike
Mar 22, 2013 @ 21:46:29
subjective…. subjective experiences
LikeLike
Mar 23, 2013 @ 07:22:23
Miracles too are facts, though, and as such they too ought to be studied. They do not all happen through what the beneficiary may interpret as some supernatural intervention. There are cases showing that the potential for sudden and very fast healing simply exists in our body, the question is how to activate at will that potential capacity that usually lies dormant.
LikeLike